Astonishing, ridiculous, but it’s true.
February 5th, 2007 by yeop-zulfaSounds familiar? Well , that was the front page title of new Sunday times yesterday. But today I will take the title to a story of different scope and perspective.
To quote mr kathirasen’s words from page 19 :
Are we wrong to hold universities to a higher standard than schools and other educational institutions?
aren’t universities the apex of our education system where young adults are shaped into THINKING people?
Aren’t universities supposed to broaden the mind of students?
Aren’t universities the grounds from which the next crop of leaders arise?
4 questions to be precise.
From my observations, I may conclude but not generalize and apply it to all the university students(or ex university students). I have encountered a number of ex-students of a prominent local university. some of them are from my secondary school and most of them either colleagues or workmate.
During my interrogations(normal conversations really), I found out that they lack general knowledge and a proper command of English ,even as a secondary language. Both of this traits are not acquired through drills in class or any other approaches. you just can’t buy language skills. It is more about reading, documentaries, reading again and the most important lessons from the school of hard knocks, interaction with other people.
Going to university is not about gaining good grades and upon graduation, get the scroll and expecting a good job. That is the impression that have been given by a lot of people. If this shallow perception still exist, no point of getting a degree or diploma when just getting it is the main point, so that other people recognizes you as an educated person.
Which is not.
Trying to answer mr kathirasen’s question, going for a tertiary education is, in addition to gain knowledge, is to further building character that have been developed during the secondary education stage. it is also to build confidence, creative and cognitive thinking , as well as interaction between different group of society. In addition to that, preparation to face the real and brutal world. Also there is the ability to make the right decisions in a critical situation. That was it.
When we talk about preparation to face the real world, various activities have been done in this level which is to expose them, such example can be seen through community projects, reserve officer training units and so on. If the students(or ex-students) absorbs these elements, the problem never existed. What I see is shallowness and ‘banking on’ petty and trivial matters, making a mountain out of a molehill.
They have yet to see beyond the façade and short sightedness in making crucial decisions in the prevailing circumstances and conditions.
When the ability to see beyond the façade is not there, this reflects their ability to think, which the most important element is being in a tertiary education level. That is why all institutions, when stipulating the criteria of employing people, required the tertiary education, which they assume will make a person a thinking person. Which is not also.
Too sad, but it’s true. No wonder during these hard times, a lot of graduates failed to make it. Because of the values that they adopted, employers don’t require non-thinking people, no matter how many straight A’s these students have.
We might have to go back to the industrial needs. Are those students really interested in that field or just another one coming into the ‘herd’? Normally, the teaching personnel are being brought back from the industry as to instill real working situations to the students. If they are just teaching after they graduated, what experience do they get from the industry?
Experiencing the real world is more important than solely depends on theory, which in turn, make them so idealistic, but that does not apply to the real world. Experience and theory go together, that is the most important part of any professional qualification and training. This applies directly to the industry.
Is it the shortsightedness of the policy makers in making the crucial decisions? Is it just society pressure of merely getting a degree or diploma to be recognised as an educated person? Is it lack of experience of the teaching staff that made the students too result oriented and ‘cut and paste’ method of education?
Mind broadening does not happens? Does the students just mingled with their own society, with regard to locality, tribal or clan?
Do remember that from these grounds that the next crop of leaders should arise. This is not. We can see that most political parties prefer non-professionals to be their young leader. a lot of young professionals have been shunned because of their education or professional status.
Are we seeing a decline of our own civilization? At one time promoting education as a step to eradicate poverty, and at the same time doing things otherwise?
If these conditions persists, what we see in the years to come that we are going to become another extinct civilization : see Inca, Maya ,Egyptians,Abbasiah, Othmaniah, Mesopotamia, Mohenjodaro-Harappa, Roman , Babylonian, Greeks, Macedonian, Carthagian, Mongols and so on.
When knowledge flourished, these empires are very well respected, either in the fields of military, education, culture, science, trade, art or anything that may reflect the advance elements during their period of glory. Ignorance and failure to maintain their standings in their respective fields have made the civilizations extinct, up until there are no records whatsoever of their achievements. Too bad if that happens to us, but then, we are on our way there.



















